Update 1/11 2:00p EST: New video from the agent’s POV shows Good was not a threat, deliberately steered around the agent. We’ve added the video below.
Every angle says the same thing.
Video footage from bystanders at the scene of a fatal ICE shooting in Minneapolis directly contradicts the Trump administration’s claims that agents were “ambushed” and acted in self-defense—showing instead that federal agents opened fire on a man inside his vehicle with no visible provocation.
WHAT’S GOING ON: On Wednesday, ICE agents shot and killed a woman during an immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis.
Neighbors just released a new angle of the ICE shooting and it settles any debate on what actually happened.
— gino.eth 💽 (@GinoTheGhost) January 9, 2026
This was a mother doing something completely ordinary: Dropping somebody off, then trying to leave. She goes to pull out, stops for one car to pass, then waves the agents… pic.twitter.com/KPyl6tDuts
Within hours, the Department of Homeland Security and President Trump himself were spinning a narrative of brave agents under attack. Trump claimed the agents “came under fire” and were “ambushed,” while DHS Secretary Kristi Noem called it a “violent attack” on federal officers.
There’s just one problem: multiple eyewitness videos tell a completely different story.
THE DETAILS: The footage, captured by residents in the neighborhood, shows ICE agents surrounding a vehicle and opening fire while the man remained inside.
Witnesses reported seeing no weapon brandished by the victim, no shots fired at agents, and no “ambush” whatsoever. The videos show a chaotic scene of agents shooting into a car—not agents defending themselves from an armed attacker.
Here is a zoomed in slowed down version. pic.twitter.com/tLIgGg0WMg
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) January 7, 2026
Trump’s statement was characteristically dramatic and demonstrably false: he praised the agents for their bravery in surviving what he described as an armed assault. DHS amplified this narrative across official channels, painting the victim as an aggressor who left agents no choice.
The eyewitness evidence suggests the opposite: that ICE agents killed a man who posed no visible threat, then immediately began constructing a cover story.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” —George Orwell, 1984 https://t.co/55oFQJMlHk
— Democrats (@TheDemocrats) January 7, 2026
A blurry video taken from further away also went viral, with many on the right claiming it tells the “full” story, and that it shows the car hitting the officer before he fired.. But see for yourself – this video does not prove any of that.
WHY IT MATTERS: This isn’t just about one shooting—it’s about a federal agency that operates with near-total impunity, kills people, and then lies about it with the full backing of the White House.
When bystander videos can so thoroughly demolish an official government narrative within hours, it raises the obvious question: how many other ICE killings have been justified with fabricated “self-defense” claims when there were no cameras rolling?
The Trump administration has given ICE unprecedented authority to conduct raids, make arrests, and use force. If agents know they can shoot first and have the president personally vouch for their heroism afterward—regardless of what actually happened—that’s not law enforcement. That’s a death squad with good PR.
BOTTOM LINE: The videos exist. The administration’s story doesn’t hold up. And a man is dead. The question now is whether anyone in power will be held accountable, or whether “ICE agents felt threatened” will continue to be a blank check for state violence.